• +1 800 982 4489
  • sales@watertechnologiescanada.com

Monthly Archives:February 2017

Obama’s Speechwriter Shares 5 Storytelling Tips

Obama’s Speechwriter Shares 5 Storytelling Tips

There is a great story behind Obama’s excellence in his speeches.  Jon Favreau was the director of speech-writing for Obama for 8 years until 2014.  Jon shared five golden tips of storytelling that certainly do not only apply in politics, but in business presentations and every speech you need to make.

1.  The story is more important than the words

“In my experience communications too often focuses on finding the right words. Of course words are important at some point in the process. But the first question you have to ask yourself is: what is the story I’m trying to sell? That is essential, and should be the starting point.”

Before Favreau started writing a speech, he would always start with simply talking to Obama. “He would give me a few random thoughts off the top of his head of what he wanted to say. The interesting thing about the President is that he always instantly gave the most logical outline of a speech I had ever heard. I was always impressed by his ability to start with clear rhetoric and add arguments and anecdotes later.”

2.  Keep it simple

“Long speeches are the easiest to write. They are also the most forgettable”, Favreau explained. “Audiences today can only handle so much information before they start losing focus. You should aim at twenty minutes max. That requires tremendous discipline, especially if you’re in an organisation with a lot of people in the mix. But remember that a speech about everything is a speech about nothing. Narrow your story down to the essential point.

3.  Always address the arguments against your position during your presentation, not after.

Especially in politics it is important to think about the objections you will encounter. “You should find them and address them during your speech. When Obama was trying to deliver his Health Care Reform Plan in 2009, the most important part of his speech was to find the arguments that the Republicans would think of and contradict them.”

4.  Empathy is key

Just knowing your audience is not enough, Favreau said. “You have to know what the world looks like when you are in their shoes. One of the reasons why Obama’s speeches are so successful is because they are written in the language that his audience understands, addressing the issues they are facing.”

5.  There is no persuasion without inspiration

Emotion is the most important element of motivating an audience, according to Favreau: “The best way to connect with people is through stories that are important to people’s lives. In the victory speech in 2008 we had a clear message: sometimes change can come slow, but change is always possible and history has proved that.”

Favreau-Obama-SpeechFavreau and Obama decided to use a special story about a woman named Ann Nixon Cooper:

She’s a lot like the millions of others who stood in line to make their voice heard in this election except for one thing – Ann Nixon Cooper is 106 years old.

She was born just a generation past slavery; a time when there were no cars on the road or planes in the sky; when someone like her couldn’t vote for two reasons – because she was a woman and because of the colour of her skin.

And tonight, I think about all that she’s seen throughout her century in America – the heartache and the hope; the struggle and the progress; the times we were told that we can’t, and the people who pressed on with that American creed: Yes, we can.

Favreau decided to give Ann Nixon Cooper a call before using her story in the speech: “I told her that man who was about to become President wanted to name her in his victory speech. She paused for a while and asked: ‘Will it be on television?’ I said ‘yes’. She waited a little longer. ‘Which channel will it be on?’, she asked, so I told her. That was when she said ‘I’m so proud of him, I’m so proud of us’. She started crying and so did I and at exactly that moment the results from Ohio came in. That was when I realised that it would always be difficult to bring about change but that it can happen if we believe.”

It is clear that we as humans love stories and the connection it brings to our lives.  Learn to tell stories and cement them with facts, anecdotes and logic.

Trevor Ambrose
Director | Presentation & Sales Training

Investment outlook for 2017

My startup investment outlook for 2017

 Published on 

We are in times of transition. I never experienced it before, but I’m also young in this game.

I imagine it’s similar to the mid 1980ies when the personal computer wave faded. Or the early 2000s when the internet rush ended. Those too were times of transitions.

But history shows a new innovation will soon emerge and reach critical support. Certainty will return.

I experienced the latest of these waves. The mobile internet. I remember being absolutely certain about the future. The internet would go mobile.

Every website and application needed to be redesigned to the smartphone. I knew the change would be big enough for startups to battle the dot.com winners. At the same time, the mobile was cheap enough for new users to access the internet. Kids, teens and people in developing countries would want different applications. I knew it.

During the past year, it became increasingly clear to me that the mobile internet wave is fading. The big winners have been found. The pitches I see now are “the Uber of” some small segment.

Entering 2017, I don’t know anything for sure. There is no certain wave everyone is riding. But it’s exactly at times like this the biggest winners are made. Founders and investors who catch the next wave before it becomes obvious will make history.

Where we are going

My general belief about the future of the human race can be summed up in one word: Omnipotence. Humans have strived for the same ideal throughout history. The ideal has been called Zeus, Odin or modern superhero names. Their characteristics: They are all knowing, omnipresent, extremely powerful and immortal. Most telling of all, they look and behave as human beings. And this is where we are heading.

To a pre-modern human, we would already seem omnipotent. All knowing because we can seemingly access all of the world’s information though a screen in our pocket. Omnipresent because we are connected on social media and can move by car and airplane. Extremely powerful because can manage huge projects with software and turn of lights with our voice. Immortal because we can fix most diseases and live to be a hundred.

But modern humans know we still have far to go.

Approaching all knowing

The internet and mobilization of the internet basically made us all knowing. We managed to digitize information and transfer it via fiber and radio waves to everyone’s pockets. Sensors, cameras and peer generated content provided new sources of data. However, there is still a lot that we don’t know.

We don’t know what we are eating, the true state of our body or what a baby is thinking. We don’t know who would be our perfect spouse or how long we need to sleep.

What we need are new type of sensors and improved understanding of the existing data. I think those are big opportunities in the coming year.

Approaching omnipresence

Even though pre-modern humans would be amazed how quickly we get around today, we are still far from true omnipresence. Food, medicine and people are still moved by relatively slow means of transportation.

In order to become truly omnipresent, we must turn physical objects instantly available. But because physical objects cannot be digitized, we only have three options. 1. Move them much more efficient, 2. Replicate them, 3. Substitute them with something else.

Drones and self-moving vehicles can move objects and people extremely efficiently. Alternatively, we could replicate the things we need. Aside from the potential dangers, having a medicine machine at home would make a lot of sense. In some cases, we could substitute people with humanoid robots, AI or avatars in VR. I would bet on startups that did any of this.

Relatively powerful

In pre-modern times, almost everyone was farming or hunting. Today, only a few percent create food to the rest of us. Machines and software coursed leapfrogs in what a single human can accomplish. I feel it when Google Maps navigate me places I never been before

However, I don’t feel very powerful when I need a key to open my door or don’t understand what a book is trying to teach me. To be powerful is to be in control. But to be in control requires tools. We need are more tools.

IoT will help turn objects into tools and interactive interfaces and virtual environments will help me learn new skills. In this field, there is a lot to be done for startups.

Far from immortality

We will not achieve immortality any time soon. In fact, I believe we still got basic plummeting to do. Like just monitoring the state of our health or actually understanding the brain.

In the short term, the obvious task is to get everyone to wear a tracker. But no one likes to strap something bulky on and off all the time. Trackers must be tiny and permanent. Also they need to measure things that really matter. Things you currently need blood samples to get.

When we actually understand our body and what goes on, it will unleash a world of applications. But right now I look for startups that will do the ground work.

Happy new year everyone.

Visit us at www.accelerace.dk.

Alberta’s first refinery in 30 years

Alberta’s first refinery in 30 years

Ian MacGregor, president and CEO of NW Refining, says:

Converting the raw bitumen that Alberta produces into diesel fuel, that’s our primary product. The first step in the process is adding diluent in it to pump it in a pipeline, we take the diluent out and the rest of the process is adding hydrogen to bitumen.

It’s the first refinery to be built with an integrated carbon capture and storage (CCS) system. The refinery—along with Agrium, a fertilizer facility adjacent to the site—will capture almost 5,000 tons of CO2 per day.

Sturgeon refinery has moved into the future – we’ve been able to incorporate what we think it is technology for the future in the refinery we are building today.The most important one I feel is carbon capture. When you refine you have to add hydrogen to the heavy oil. When you make a molecule of hydrogen, you make a molecule of CO2 at the same time. In any other refinery in the world the CO2 is vented.

The CO2 will then travel down the Alberta Carbon Trunk Line (ACTL), a 240-kilometer pipeline running from Northern to Southern Alberta, built by Enhance Energy, a company specializing in CCS technology. In the future, the ACTL will be able to handle CO2 from other plants looking to reduce emissions, and will take the CO2 to mature oil fields in Alberta to be used for enhanced oil recovery (EOR).

In a refinery like this that’s the same amount of CO2 as 400,000 cars driving around. We are going to capture that CO2 here. A sister company is building a pipeline to take it to central Alberta and use it for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). So, we can go to old oil reservoirs and put the CO2 in them and get a lot of additional oil that’s stuck in the reservoir out.

EOR helps to extend the life of mature oil fields by pumping CO2 into the ground which then forces the oil closer to the production well. The process can extend the life of a well by up to 20 years, which increases profits, maintains jobs and reduces the environmental impact of building new wells.

But EOR is also a method of CO2 storage. As CO2 enters the ground, it remains within the pore spaces left behind by the oil. Some CO2 will emerge at the production well, where it will be immediately injected back into the ground.

When it comes to water usage:

We really spent a lot of time trying to reduce our water consumption here, we use air cooling rather than more traditional water cooling, we capture every drop of water that hits the site, and any of the wastewater that comes out is heavily treated and recycled back into the process, so we really reduced our water consumption compared with a traditional refinery.

How about sulfur?

We have more sulfur removal capacity than anyone else does, we put an extra stage of sulfur recovery in, so we are quite a bit less than the current regulatory limits would allow you to put out, but we felt we are building something for the next 100 years.

Population growth in Canada

Population size and growth in Canada: Key results from the 2016 Census

Released: 2017-02-08

Today, Statistics Canada provides Canadians with a first glimpse of the latest national statistical portrait with results of the 2016 Census count on population and dwellings.

The count tallies 35,151,728 people who reported living in Canada on Census Day, May 10, 2016, and shows the patterns of population growth across the country.

Over the coming year—as Canadians celebrate 150 years since Confederation—the agency will unveil the full range of census data that will together paint a factual picture of the lives of Canadians and their communities.

The population count in 2016 was 10 times greater than in 1871, when the first census after Confederation recorded 3.5 million people in Canada. By 1967, when Canadians were toasting 100 years since Confederation, that number had grown to 20.0 million (1966 Census).

Over the years, Canadians have been trekking west. In 1871, most Canadians lived in the four founding provinces of Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, while Western Canada was sparsely populated. By 2016, close to one-third of the population lived in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia.

Canada’s population: Migratory increase accounts for two-thirds of growth

From 2011 to 2016, the population increased by 1.7 million or 5.0%, a slightly lower rate than 5.9% from 2006 to 2011.

Infographic 1  Thumbnail for Infographic 1: Annual average growth rate, natural increase and migratory increase per intercensal period, Canada, 1851 to 2056
Annual average growth rate, natural increase and migratory increase per intercensal period, Canada, 1851 to 2056

About two-thirds of Canada’s population growth from 2011 to 2016 was the result of migratory increase (the difference between the number of immigrants and emigrants). Natural increase (the difference between the number of births and deaths) accounted for the remaining one-third. In the coming years, population growth in Canada is projected to be increasingly linked to migratory increase rather than natural increase, mainly because of low fertility and an aging population.

International comparisons: Canada has the highest population growth among G7 countries

Canada led the G7 in population growth from 2011 to 2016, rising on average 1.0% per year, a ranking also recorded over the two previous intercensal periods (2001 to 2006 and 2006 to 2011).

Chart 1  Chart 1: Average annual population growth rate among G20 and G7 countries, 2011 to 2016¹
Average annual population growth rate among G20 and G7 countries, 2011 to 2016¹

As in Canada, migratory increase is the key driver of population growth in other G7 countries, such as the United Kingdom, Germany and Italy. In addition, three G7 countries—Germany, Italy and Japan—have recorded more deaths than births in recent years, meaning that the population growth in these countries depended entirely on migratory increase.

Canada’s average annual population growth rate of 1.0% from 2011 to 2016 was the eighth highest among G20 countries, behind Saudi Arabia, Turkey, South Africa, Australia, Mexico, Indonesia and India.

Population density: Two-thirds of Canadians live close to the southern border

Canada has a small population living in a large land area (close to 9 million square kilometres), leading to a low population density compared with other countries. For example, Canada had 3.9 people per square kilometre in 2016, compared with 35.3 people per square kilometre in the United States.

The Canadian population, however, is highly concentrated geographically. In 2016, two out of three people (66%) lived within 100 kilometres of the southern Canada–United States border, an area that represents about 4% of Canada’s territory.

Many census metropolitan areas (CMAs) are located near the border, including Toronto, Montréal and Vancouver. The population density of some municipalities located in these CMAs is well above the national average. The municipality of Vancouver had the highest population density in Canada, with more than 5,400 people per square kilometre. Among municipalities of 5,000 or more inhabitants, the next three with the highest population density were located in the Montréal CMA—Westmount, Côte-Saint-Luc and Montréal.

Canada 150: From Confederation to the 2016 Census

Canada’s population has increased tenfold since Confederation. However, the country’s population growth has not been constant over those 150 years.

In the three decades that followed Confederation, the number of people in Canada grew rapidly, entirely as a result of natural increase. At that period and despite large waves of immigration, the country recorded migratory losses because many people departed for the United States.

This pattern changed at the turn of the 20th century. From 1901 to 1911, the Canadian population grew 3.0% on average each year, a rate that remains the fastest in the country’s history. The robust population growth was attributable to both strong natural increase and strong migratory increase. During this decade, more than 1.6 million immigrants came to Canada, with many settling in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia.

Population growth slowed again in the 1930s, as couples had fewer children and immigration levels fell. These decreases were partly attributable to the Great Depression.

After the Second World War, however, immigration levels rose again, and fertility rates increased considerably, leading to the baby boom. As a result, Canada’s population growth rate in the 1950s was close to the records set at the beginning of the century.

By the time the country celebrated its 100th anniversary in 1967, 20.0 million people called Canada home.

Since the mid-1960s, the fertility rate of women has gradually decreased. With Canadian families having fewer children, migratory increase became the key driver of population growth at the end of the 1990s.

For more information on the Canadian population over the last 150 years, see the 2016 Census videos, the infographic and thematic maps.

Provinces and territories

Population growth increases from east to west

The overall population growth masks considerable differences among the provinces and territories. Population growth tended to be higher in Western Canada and lower in Eastern Canada.

Chart 2  Chart 2: Population growth rate, Canada, provinces and territories, 2006 to 2011 and 2011 to 2016
Population growth rate, Canada, provinces and territories, 2006 to 2011 and 2011 to 2016

Atlantic provinces: Lower population growth

From 2011 to 2016, the population grew more slowly in the Atlantic provinces than elsewhere in Canada, as was the case during the two previous intercensal periods. Prince Edward Island (+1.9%) recorded the fastest increase in Atlantic Canada, followed by Newfoundland and Labrador (+1.0%) and Nova Scotia (+0.2%). The population declined 0.5% in New Brunswick, the only province or territory to record a decrease from 2011 to 2016.

The slower population growth in Atlantic Canada was due to interprovincial migration losses, lower immigration levels and lower natural increases. For example, Newfoundland and Labrador reported more deaths than births in some of the years from 2011 to 2016.

As a result of lower population growth, the share of Canadians living in the Atlantic region has decreased in the last five decades. In 2016, 6.6% of Canadians lived in the Atlantic provinces, with Nova Scotia (2.6%) accounting for the largest share, followed by New Brunswick (2.1%), Newfoundland and Labrador (1.5%) and Prince Edward Island (0.4%).

In contrast, 10% of Canadians were living in the Atlantic provinces in 1966.

Central Canada: Three in five Canadians live in Quebec and Ontario

In 2016, Ontario and Quebec accounted for 61.5% of the Canadian population. Since 1911 (the first census after Alberta and Saskatchewan joined Confederation), this proportion has ranged from 60% to 64%.

Ontario remained, by far, the most populous province in Canada with 13.4 million people calling it home in 2016, representing 38.3% of the Canadian population. This share was down slightly from the 100-year high of 38.5% in 2006.

The smaller population share was due to a slowdown in Ontario’s growth rate. The number of people in the province rose 4.6% from 2011 to 2016, following a 5.7% gain in the previous five-year period. Ontario’s rate of population growth was below the national average for two consecutive intercensal periods, a first since the Second World War. Lower immigration levels and interprovincial migration losses accounted for most of the recent slowdown.

In Quebec, the population surpassed the 8-million mark for the first time in census history in 2016. The rate of growth was 3.3% from 2011 to 2016, below the national average of 5.0%. Because Quebec’s population growth rate has remained below the national growth rate for the past 40 years, its share of the total Canadian population has fallen from 28.9% in 1966 to 23.2% in 2016.

Western provinces: Provincial population growth highest in all three Prairie provinces

For the first time since joining Confederation, all three Prairie provinces recorded the highest rates of provincial population growth from 2011 to 2016.

Population growth accelerated in Alberta and Manitoba―the only two provinces to post higher growth rates from 2011 to 2016 compared with the previous intercensal period.

Alberta (+11.6%) had the fastest growth rate among the provinces, up from 10.8% from 2006 to 2011. This was more than double the national average. Alberta also recorded the highest growth among provinces during the two previous intercensal periods.

Manitoba’s population increased 5.8% from 2011 to 2016, posting a higher growth rate than the national average for the first time in 80 years. Most of the gain was due to stronger international migration.

In Saskatchewan, the population rose 6.3% from 2011 and 2016. The province’s population growth rate was above the national average for the second consecutive intercensal period.

The number of people living in British Columbia also increased more rapidly than the national average, up 5.6% from 2011 to 2016.

The four western provinces were the only provinces to record population growth rates higher than the national average. As a result of this growth, almost one-third (31.6%) of Canadians lived in the West in 2016, the largest share on record. British Columbia accounted for the largest proportion (13.2%), followed by Alberta (11.6%), Manitoba (3.6%) and Saskatchewan (3.1%).

The territories: High fertility boosts Nunavut’s population growth

Combined, the three territories were home to just over 113,600 people in 2016, representing 0.3% of the total Canadian population. This share has changed little since 1911.

Nunavut (+12.7%) recorded the highest rate of growth among the provinces and territories. Fertility levels in Nunavut are the highest in Canada, with women giving birth to 2.9 children on average in Nunavut, compared with the national average of 1.6 children. For the first time since Nunavut was founded in 1999, its population surpassed that of Yukon.

The population of Yukon grew 5.8% from 2011 to 2016. While this rate was above the national average, it was nonetheless down from the rate of 11.6% recorded from 2006 to 2011. The slower rate was mainly due to interprovincial migration losses.

In the Northwest Territories, the population continued to increase slowly, up 0.8% from 2011 to 2016.

Census metropolitan areas

There are now 35 CMAs in Canada, up from 33 the previous census (see note to readers). The three largest CMAs in 2016—Toronto, Montréal and Vancouver—were home to more than one-third of all Canadians (35.5%), with a combined population of 12.5 million. Toronto (5,928,040 inhabitants) had the largest population, followed by Montréal, which surpassed 4 million inhabitants for the first time in census history (4,098,927), and Vancouver (2,463,431).

Chart 3  Chart 3: Population growth rate among census metropolitan areas (CMAs) in Canada, 2006 to 2011 and 2011 to 2016, ranked by percentage growth in 2016
Population growth rate among census metropolitan areas (CMAs) in Canada, 2006 to 2011 and 2011 to 2016, ranked by percentage growth in 2016

As a result of strong growth over the last 15 years, Calgary (1,392,609) became the fourth largest CMA in the country in 2016, replacing Ottawa–Gatineau (1,323,783), which fell to fifth place. Edmonton was a close sixth at 1,321,426 inhabitants.

Five fastest growing census metropolitan areas located in the Prairies

From 2011 to 2016, the population grew the fastest in five CMAs located in the Prairie provinces: Calgary (+14.6%), Edmonton (+13.9%), Saskatoon (+12.5%), Regina (+11.8%) and Lethbridge (+10.8%). The three fastest growing CMAs were unchanged from the previous intercensal period.

Population growth accelerates in seven census metropolitan areas

Population growth accelerated in seven CMAs. The increase in the rate of population growth from 2011 to 2016 compared with the previous intercensal period was about two or more percentage points in these seven CMAs: three in Ontario (Windsor, St. Catharines–Niagara and Guelph), two in Alberta (Calgary and Edmonton), one in Saskatchewan (Regina) and one in British Columbia (Victoria).

Population growth accelerated the most in Windsor, Ontario, with the number of people living in the CMA rising 3.1% from 2011 to 2016 following a 1.3% decline from 2006 to 2011. The decrease in the previous intercensal period may have been attributable to Windsor’s automotive sector, which was particularly affected by the recession in 2008 and 2009.

Population growth slows in many eastern and some central census metropolitan areas

The population grew at a slower pace in many eastern and some central CMAs compared with the previous intercensal period.

The number of people living in Moncton, New Brunswick, rose 4.0% from 2011 to 2016, following a 9.5% gain from 2006 to 2011, while the population in St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, was up 4.6%, following an 8.7% increase in the previous intercensal period.

The population also grew less quickly in Kingston, Ontario, up 1.0% from 2011 to 2016, after a 4.7% increase in the previous intercensal period. Ottawa–Gatineau recorded slower growth as well, with its population rising 5.5% from 2011 to 2016, following a 9.0% gain from 2006 to 2011.

From 2011 to 2016, the number of people living in the country’s three largest CMAs also grew at a slower pace. In Toronto, the population grew 6.2% following a 9.2% gain from 2006 to 2011, while in Montréal, the population rose 4.2% following a 5.3% increase. In Vancouver, the number of people was up 6.5% from 2011 to 2016, after growing 9.3% during the previous intercensal period.

Population unchanged or down in only two census metropolitan areas: Thunder Bay and Saint John

The population was unchanged or declined in only two CMAs from 2011 to 2016: Thunder Bay, Ontario, and Saint John, New Brunswick.

Low population growth in the CMA of Thunder Bay may be partly attributable to fluctuations in the mining and forestry industries, which often affect the area’s overall economy.

In Saint John, the population declined 2.2% from 2011 to 2016, following a 4.4% increase from 2006 to 2011. Most of the decrease was attributable to interprovincial migration losses.

For more information on population growth in the CMAs by census tract, see the 2016 Census thematic maps.

Census agglomerations

Fastest growing census agglomerations located mostly on the Prairies

From 2011 to 2016, 7 of the 10 census agglomerations (CAs) with the highest population growth rates were located on the Prairies: four in Alberta, two in Manitoba and one on the Saskatchewan–Alberta border. The population grew the fastest in Sylvan Lake, Alberta, up 19.6% from 2011 to 2016.

The other three fastest growing CAs were Wasaga Beach and Collingwood, in Ontario, and Squamish, British Columbia.

Some CAs recorded a population decline from 2006 to 2011, but posted population growth from 2011 to 2016. This occurred in Thompson, Manitoba, where the number of people rose 6.6% from 2011 to 2016, following a 4.6% drop from 2006 to 2011; Kawartha Lakes, Ontario, where the population grew 3.0%, after decreasing 1.8%; and Port Hope, Ontario, where the number of people was up 3.3%, following a 1.1% decline.

Atlantic provinces and Central Canada: Substantial population declines in nine census agglomerations

From 2011 to 2016, 9 of the 10 fastest decreasing CAs were located in the Atlantic provinces or Central Canada: four in Ontario, two in Nova Scotia, one in New Brunswick, one in Quebec and one on the border of New Brunswick and Quebec. The 10thCA is Prince Rupert, British Columbia, where the population fell by 2.8%, the seventh fastest rate of decline.

The number of people in Campbellton, which straddles the New Brunswick–Quebec border, fell 9.3%, the largest population decrease among CAs.

In Nova Scotia, the population decreased in every CA. New Glasgow (-3.7%) posted the strongest percentage decrease, followed by Cape Breton (-2.9%), Kentville (-0.5%) and Truro (-0.3%).

Some municipalities went from an increase or a stable population size from 2006 to 2011 to a decrease from 2011 to 2016. In four CAs, the rate changed by at least five percentage points: Campbellton, New Brunswick–Quebec; Quesnel, British Columbia; Pembroke, Ontario; and Rivière-du-Loup, Quebec.

For more information on the 2016 Census results for municipalities, see “Municipalities in Canada with the largest and fastest-growing populations between 2011 and 2016” and “Municipalities in Canada with population decreases between 2011 and 2016“.

Additional information is available the Focus on Geography Series, the Census Profile and Highlight tables.

Dwellings

Number of occupied private dwellings is increasing

In Canada, the number of private dwellings occupied by usual residents increased 5.6% from 2011 to 14,072,079 in 2016, following a 7.1% increase in the previous intercensal period.

Nunavut (+13.4%) recorded the fastest growth in dwellings, in line with its population growth, which was also the highest in Canada. Alberta (+9.9%) posted the second largest percentage increase, followed by Yukon (+7.8%) and British Columbia (+6.6%).

Manitoba and Nunavut were the only jurisdictions to post higher growth in private occupied dwellings compared with the previous five-year period.

The number of dwellings rose more slowly than the national rate in the Atlantic provinces, Quebec, Manitoba, and the Northwest Territories.

In Ontario (+5.8%) and Saskatchewan (+5.6%), the number of dwellings increased at a pace similar to the national rate. The gain in Ontario (+281,666), the largest in absolute numbers in Canada, was more than twice the size of increases in Alberta (+137,403) and Quebec (+136,320).